Gracias freeresetstopifree, a mi Google no me deja verlo; me cubre toda esa parte con una ventana y un link a otros sitios relacionados con el Coronavirus.
También me desactivo, reportar el problema; cada vez que lo intento se queda colgada la ventana de reportar.
Lo voy a poner debajo en lo comentarios; para al menos saber la fecha.
Lo que sucede específicamente en este astuto truco es que el algoritmo primero y los que revisan el reclamo despues, los mismos subordinados de lo programadores, que a su vez son subordinados de Zuckerberg (una politica piramidal y si no te gusta renuncia a tu trabajo); se basa en el uso de gentilicios (para los que no saben qué es un gentilicio: cubanos, españoles, americanos,...) y le dan una interpretación particular de que según ellos yo o cualquiera que use gentilicios se refiere en ese tipo de expresión coloquial a todos los habitantes de un país.
You can look up what I say here for yourself:
Tunnp's lawyers are far from defending him from those who accuse him and from showing that this trial is unconstitutional and counterproductive to lower the polarization of the country as I do here; Surprisingly, they began to praise the Trunnp accusers, the way, the good legal practices with which this trial was held ...
From Cuba we know that in rigged trials they put you lawyers, just to save appearances before the public opinion, but that those who prepare the Show already have the sentence beforehand and the discussions are a mere and boring formality for everyone?
This was never seen before in the legal history of the United States; because this is typical of a legal system flawed from power like that of Cuba; where defense attorneys fear for their future life and begin their defense by praising the legal system, those who organize the trial, to see if through this begging route, they themselves feel that the system works for themselves, for the role that they play. play.
The president of the Supreme Court, John Roberts refused to preside over the trial, since Trump is no longer the president, he does not work for the government, nor does he receive a government salary; He is just another common citizen, without special powers.
In other words, the trial is unconstitutional according to the interpretation made by Crema y Nata of the Supreme Court, of the US Federal Constitution.
As in 1959 in Cuba when the judges of the Supreme Court refused to hold unconstitutional trials; the Democrats went ahead and so Senator Pat Leahy (coincidentally, Bernie Sanders' Democrat of the State) is the Speaker of the Senate (said, President Pro-tempore).
Leahy himself presides over the trial, also acts as a jury and at the same time acts as a witness; with all the partiality and subjectivity that the latter implies in expert matters; because he was in the Capitol on January 6 during the main events that the Trial is dealing with and in which Trunnp did not participate.
Because by the way, something that has been very well hidden by all means:
The Head of Capitol Security is the Speaker of de House; she is to say the Head of the House of the Representatives of the Town; Of course it couldn't be otherwise and guess who is that illustrious personality?
Nancy Pelosy and not Trunnp as we have been led to believe so far.
Trunnp is the Head of Security for her House, The White House; ... even logical thing:
Where was Pelosi, what did she do, ... who neglected part of her Responsibilities and allowed the interference of some common citizens within her House?
The classic Cuban legal threeway:
In their hatred and frustration against Trunnp, the Democrats have achieved the Classic Cuban triplet; where the extreme Left, the Castro Family are Prosecutors, Judges and Witnesses against their ideological adversaries and where there is no balance or legal rationality!
They are making an unconstitutional judgment, for which Congress has no jurisdiction; because Trunnp is an ordinary citizen, not a public official.
To judge an ordinary citizen, there is already the traditional justice system, its Courts and even the traditional Supreme Court to decide its Unconstitutionality.
In Cuba, those who previously supported the castros in exchange for perks, later learned the consequences and the danger of the political boomerang:
In other words, if this precedent is sown; When Congress is in the hands of a Party, it will be able to make judgments of any common citizen of the other Party who does not like them very much, who is uncomfortable with their ideological and economic interests.
To know that this is unconstitutional you do not have to have studied Law, most Americans according to the polls are saying it and because this is the typical trial that we have seen in Cuba since January 6, 1959 that the State Department recognized Fidel.
And what is Cuba?
A Totalitarian Socialist Dictatorship.
So; We were conspiranoids when we said that in the United States the Cuban Totalitarian Socialism was being enthroned little by little?
Now it is demonstrated that this has also reached the US Legal System and this would be fatal, this is even more dangerous; because it would not only be an attack against Democracy, but against the Republic (the Rule of Law), which is what has maintained the balance of power in the US.
On the other hand, the sale of weapons and bullets in the US did not drop as Democratic analysts believed; Rather, it reached record numbers after the Democrats took office and Congress.
Draw your own conclusions about how Americans feel.
So what we have felt in our own flesh:
We were or are conspiracy when we say that the US has been enthroned for a long time Socialism from the Schools, from the Big Traditional Media and now from the Social Media?
We are conspiranoic when we say that in the United States people are indoctrinated with ideas of the extreme Left; so that in the end it seems normal?
"Siendo que una bien regulada milicia es necesaria para la seguridad de un Estado libre, el derecho de las personas a tener y cargar armas no será infringido", reza esta enmienda escrita en 1791, cuando el monopolio de la fuerza del incipiente Estado norteamericano era aún una aspiración.